What is a Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis?

The Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis is a collaborative tool used to systematically identify and analyze the potential causes of a specific problem or challenge. 



Named for its resemblance to a fish’s skeleton, this diagram visually organizes potential causes into categories to pinpoint the root issue more effectively.

Start a Root Cause Analysis

The key components of the Fishbone Root Cause Analysis are:

The Fish Head: This is the main problem or issue you want the group to analyze.



The Spine: These are the main categories or broad areas where causes might lie. These can either be created as a standard in advance, or determined when different issues are raised. They can then be reorganized under each bone to determine the category.



The Bones : These are the specific issues that are creating the problem that need to be addressed.

Why do a Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis?

  • It provides a structured yet creative way to identify the root causes of a problem.
  • Teams can visually break down complex problems into manageable and actionable pieces.
  • It encourages diverse perspectives and input, ensuring that all potential factors are considered.
  • With an in-built timer, discussions remain focused and time-efficient.
  • Rather than addressing the symptoms of an issue or challenge, you can drill down towards a cause. This means that the action you take is more targeted and effective.

Tips for facilitating an effective Fishbone Root Cause Analysis

  • Clearly define the problem or challenge you want the team to analyze. This ensures focus and avoids irrelevant discussions.
  • Enable anonymity if possible, to encourage open and honest contributions, especially for sensitive or challenging topics.
  • Guide the discussion to dig deeper into why a particular issue is occurring, rather than just identifying surface-level symptoms. Use the 5 Why approach.
  • If multiple causes are identified, have participants vote to prioritize and figure out which root causes to address first.
  • For each identified root cause, assign actionable solutions to prevent or mitigate the issue in the future.

References

Who should do an Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis?

A Fishbone Root Cause Analysis is ideal for teams looking to solve complex problems collaboratively such as:


  • Quality assurance and control teams identifying and addressing defects or errors in products or processes.

  • Cross functional teams that have a shared problem.

  • Agile teams aiming to resolve blockers and bottlenecks.

  • Operational teams looking to improve operational efficiency and minimizing downtime.

  • Customer service teams trying to identify the root causes of customer complaints or low satisfaction scores.

  • Product development teams enhancing product design and resolving issues for new product launches.

  • Health and safety teams investigating workplace accidents or health hazards.

  • IT security teams troubleshooting system failures or security vulnerabilities.

  • Education teams looking for gaps in training programs or student performance.

  • Health care teams addressing patient care issues or inefficiencies in medical procedures.

Common Fishbone analysis formats

Four cause-category frameworks for a fishbone analysis — the 6 Ms (manufacturing), 6 Ps (service and business), 6 Ss (technology) and generic categories — each listing the factors to examine.

How to run a Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis

Firstly, identify and describe the key issue that you want the team to consider. This now becomes the head of the Fish.



If you have already selected a common format (As explained above) or have created your own, add these categories to the Spine of the Fish. Otherwise, you can simply ask participants to brainstorm freely on any section, and then sort and categorize these later.



Describe the problem to the team and ensure that they understand the issue and have asked any questions they need to clarify.



Have the team brainstorm as many potential causes (one cause per card) and add them to the Ishikawa Diagram. Once the time has passed or there are clear causes identified, have the group review and categorize them as needed. You can use votes to see where people believe the root causes lie.



Finally, based on the identified root cause ( or root causes) ask the group to create potential action items that can be put in place to address each cause. Discuss each action in turn and then assign importance and ownership. You have now completed a root cause analysis.

Start a Root Cause Analysis in GroupMap

The Fishbone (Ishikawa) Root Cause Analysis template shown in GroupMap on a laptop, tablet and phone

Save effort, time and money with GroupMap

GroupMap offers more than just an online digital whiteboard—it’s innovative platform is designed to enhance the quality of your team’s decisions. With features that prevent bias and make facilitation seamless, GroupMap ensures no single voice dominates and ensures productive, inclusive conversations. 

Its intuitive interface is easy for anyone to use, and its scalable design supports small teams and large groups whether they are face to face or around the globe. Customizable templates and workflows keep discussions focused on objectives, helping you drive actionable outcomes each and every time.

Frequently asked questions

What is a fishbone (Ishikawa) diagram?
A fishbone diagram, also known as an Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagram, is a collaborative tool for identifying and analyzing the potential causes of a problem. Causes are organized into categories so a team can pinpoint the root issue rather than the symptoms.
Why is it called a fishbone or Ishikawa diagram?
It is called a fishbone diagram because its shape resembles a fish skeleton: the problem sits at the head, main categories branch off the spine, and specific causes form the smaller bones. It is named Ishikawa after Kaoru Ishikawa, who popularized it.
What are the categories in a fishbone diagram?
Common frameworks include the 6 Ms for manufacturing, the 6 Ps for service and business, and the 6 Ss for technology, as well as generic categories. You can use a standard set of categories or create your own to fit the problem.
How is a fishbone diagram different from the 5 Whys?
A fishbone diagram maps the range of possible causes across several categories at once, while the 5 Whys drills down one cause by repeatedly asking why. The two work well together: use the 5 Whys to dig deeper into causes surfaced on the fishbone.
Who should use a fishbone root cause analysis?
It suits any team solving a complex problem together, including quality and operations teams, agile teams tackling blockers, customer service, product development, health and safety, IT security and healthcare teams.

How to run it in GroupMap

  1. Illustration of the objective-setting step in a GroupMap session

    Scene setting

    Clearly define the problem to be addressed. Add categories if desired.

  2. Illustration of the brainstorming step in a GroupMap session

    Brainstorm

    List causes on each card along the spine.

  3. Illustration of the grouping ideas step in a GroupMap session

    Group

    Discuss and group any common causes for each category.

  4. Illustration of the voting step in a GroupMap session

    Vote

    Have the team vote on the root causes of the problem that need to be addressed.

  5. Illustration of the action-planning step in a GroupMap session

    Action plan

    Identify actions for each cause. Assign owners and due dates.

  6. Illustration of the results and reporting step in a GroupMap session

    Share

    Share the outcomes of the session, including the action plan.

Ready to get everyone on the same page?

Start a free GroupMap and turn your next discussion into clear, shared decisions.